Re. The Fantastic Four recasting
I don’t know if it’s racist to be mad that the Storm’s story will have to change if one is dark and the other is light… I just think that it’s ludicrously racial and color-conscious to think that the Storm’s story has to change because they don’t have the same skin color. I don’t see how siblings aren’t siblings all of a sudden. And I’m not even going to point out that it’s entirely genetically possible for two siblings of the same parents to have different skin, hair, eyes… y’know, all the standard stuff ruled by genes, just because of the possible (and all too plausible) genetic histories of their parents. By the way, the Storms are from Long Island, not Ireland or one of the Nordic countries. So, theoretically, a writer isn’t even obliged to give the least bit of exposition as to why they don’t have the same skin color. The only reason they would feel pressure to do so is because of some sort of insane unspoken rule (in western society, especially the Americas - odd, considering it’s the home to the most muddled genetic mix ever) that people have to fit neatly into each category and, if they don’t, it better be explained or others will be ill at ease. It’s not like they announced that Johnny will be 100% Masai and Susan will be 100% Swedish but still have been raised as siblings. THAT might require explanation (even then, not much more than “Franklin and Mary Storm adopted them, because NOTHING CHANGES FROM THE POINT THAT THEY ARE RAISED IN THE SAME HOUSE)
Basically the argument against a dark skinned Johnny Storm is “It is horrible because I may have to accept seeing something that isn’t the norm, and I won’t understand it.” Not something impossible, mind you, just not the norm.
Skin color is simply a genetic trait that has been manipulated and used as a focal point in and by some of the most horrible people, belief systems and acts in human history, some of which still permeate out minds to this very day. I keep hoping that each coming generation will manage to simply get over it, but it would seem there are a lot of things that need to happen here beforehand.
Maybe I’m wrong? Someone would need to prove it to me, though.
This is what someone posted on a FB group I’m in:
This was my response:
That is all.
Many of those countries have the same race issues as we do here, some much much worse. Therefore, “Hispanic” does not mitigate all possibility of racial bias, it just makes it… bilingual? Yes, people, we still have race issues in The United States of America. Everything that’s happened since 2008 serves as continual proof that we deny this simple fact.
It’s not that they had trouble believing George Zimmerman acted with depraved indifference toward human life, it’s that they found it so easy to believe Trayvon Martin did.
After watching everyone argue about “Man of Steel,” and remembering “Dark Knight” and “Dark Knight Rises,” I think I’ve figured it out.
"E = [W + (I/S)] • R]"
"Enjoyment Level = [Writer + (Inconsistencies/Willful Suspension of Disbelief)] • Resistance to Change"
W= Christopher Nolan, Jonathan Nolan, David Goyer, or any combination of the 3.
I call it The “Goodman Theorem - A.”
I totally own this.
SCREW YOU, James Dolan, your forced trade for Melo still pisses me off. This is nothing against Melo as a player, or even as a human being, but the simple fact is he played chicken with the Knicks front office and he won. The move was excused with talk of “we gotta win now” but that’s complete and total bull. If you “gotta win now” why trade away almost your entire core of talent? A Galinari starting to come into form (because you can’t teach 6’10” with an outside touch, but you can teach him to play smarter D), A Wilson Chandler who was only getting better and had the right attitude, A young, fit, MOTIVATED Ray Felton playing the best ball of his career… Mozgov - well, really, I don’t know what he was ever going to become, or if. You then neutered your first All-Star/MVP Candidate/All-NBA Team Member (since Patrick Ewing) in Stoudemire AND stymied the development of an emerging Landry Fields AND took away the weapons who were starting to gel under D’Antoni - who, by the way, was the architect of an offense that was #1 in the league and had us RELEVANT for the first time in almost a decade. Think about that for a moment, almost a DECADE since any team even had to start to worry about playing NY. Garden was rockin’ - I know, like many of you I was there. But, okay, “we gotta win now, and screwing up our team chemistry in the middle of the season - even though this guy really wants to play here and is a free agent in a couple of months - that’s the best way to get us to a Championship NOW.” Bull, Dolan, you wanted to have an extra marquis name to justify hiking up your prices (only ONE of the reasons you’re scum). And do I even need to START to mention our draft picks? And you wonder why Donnie Walsh suddenly “fell ill?” Tell me, James Dolan, WHAT THE HELL DO YOU WANT??? Because, seriously, first you wanna build, then you wanna “win now,” I personally think you just want more money for coke and hookers. You haven’t given me a reason to think otherwise.
MELO - Let’s be real for a second: you wanted your extra $20 mil. Just admit it, it’s okay. But, you also wanted to be “the man” here, and that comes with some extra responsibilities. Guess what? Your coach wants you to move the ball AND move without it? You do it. All that crap about “coaches needing to adjust to players” is exactly that, CRAP. A coach can only do that when he can trust his guy 100% on the court, and you haven’t exactly done that, have you Melo? This isn’t about playing hard, everyone knows you do that, nobody questions that - well, maybe on the defensive end sometimes, right? Look, all I’m saying is this: Russell gave himself to his coach’s system, so did Magic, so did Bird. Jordan learned to play the triangle well before he won anything and, hell, Kobe learned to do it TWICE plus learned how to defer when necessary. That “Big 3” in Boston? They took less money, and became completely beholden to their coach in order to win. And Lebron, someone who I could go off on for days for any number of reasons? He, Wade, AND Bosh all took less to give themselves a chance at immortality with that team I can’t stand. Oh, and the Spurs? They are ALL ABOUT THE SYSTEM. But you, even at your own admission, couldn’t be troubled enough to fully commit yourself to what your coach was doing, then showed you could have been doing it all along after he was gone! So, what, you didn’t wanna give it a chance? And this year, with the coach you preferred? Solid MVP campaign to start, but - despite winning your FIRST scoring title and finishing third in MVP voting - you regressed. I don’t know if it was fatigue from a long year starting with the US Team (for whom you played your heart out, showing assistant coach D’Antoni game you NEVER showed him during the season), but you regressed. So here’s my question for you: WHAT do you WANT? If it’s all about winning, then give yourself over to your team and coach. We all know what you can do, so DO IT. And do the things you NEED to do even more. You got your extra money, so why not?
In the space of about one week, I’ve seen the following used by people (ADULTS!) attempting to win online arguments:
Someone posted a picture of an attractive woman doing cosplay, and all I could comment was “Wocka, Wocka, Wocka.” Now I think I should say that WHENEVER I meet an attractive woman, or even just happen upon one in passing. But I think I need to say it like this
People wanna post pics of one of the dead suspects all over, claiming “that’ll show’em.” Yeah, I remember when we plastered photos of Saddam’s sons blown apart in the rubble from an explosion all over the print and tv media. Because of that, evildoers the world over vowed never to be like that again, and everyone learned a valuable lesson, and everyone felt instantly vindicated and awesome. Good times.
Internet bloodlust serves nobody except the “internet tough,” who are slightly more pathetic than the “phony tough.” Leave the gore to the movie professionals.